Well, there is definitely enough in master now to warrant a release.  Looking 
through the log, I see (among other things):

- Tons of bug fixes
- My entire Google Summer of Code Project (the ode module, and also a bunch of 
bug fixes)
- Work on piecewise functions and intervals
- Wicks/Second Quant work
- Queries Module
- Probably a bunch of stuff I missed
- Did I mention the bug fixes?

So I guess it depends on how close we are with the Polys and the assumptions.  
If we are not that far, we should just wait, because doing a release is a lot 
of work.  On the other hand, those are much more major and will likely break 
more things when they are put in.  

At any rate, I think we should try to get Chris's test runner to work before 
any release, because the critical issue 1641 where the doctests do not work.  I 
also want to know Ondrej's opinion too :)

By the way, what do you mean by the simplified expand?

Aaron Meurer
On Dec 1, 2009, at 4:00 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote:

> Well, 0.7 would be a great opportunity to break the API compability
> (removing old assumptions, new polys, simplified expand etc.), so I
> thought we could make a 0.6 release before, because there are already
> enough changes accumulated. What do you think?
> 
> 2009/12/1 Aaron S. Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com>:
>> Are there going to be separate 0.6.6 and 0.7 releases?  I thought that we 
>> were going to just jump right up to 0.7.
>> 
>> Aaron Meurer
>> On Dec 1, 2009, at 3:29 PM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote:
>> 
>>> 2009/12/1 Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz>:
>>>> We have to get the new polys in finally. I will have time to write
>>>> some documentation for it --- Mateusz, could you please rebase it to
>>>> the latest master? I'll then do my best. I think it fixes lots of
>>>> problems.
>>>> 
>>>> Ondrej
>>> 
>>> Chris did already rebase it on his polys2 branch I think.
>>> 
>>> Getting it in for 0.6.6 or 0.7?
>>> 
>>> Vinzent
>>> 
>>> --
>>> 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>>> "sympy-patches" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>>> sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>>> For more options, visit this group at 
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
>>> 
>>> 
>> 
>> --
>> 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "sympy-patches" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
>> sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit this group at 
>> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
>> 
>> 
>> 
> 
> --
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy-patches" group.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
> sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit this group at 
> http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
> 
> 

--

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy-patches" group.
To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.


Reply via email to