Le mercredi 25 août 2010 à 10:56 -0700, Christian Muise a écrit : > Vinzent, et al, does the branch seem alright to go in at this point? > I'm sitting on this merge request before bringing up the more > debatable points surrounding the removal of the old assumption system. > Thanks. > > Cheers > Christian
It seems that this has finally been pushed in (including, unfortunately, a large mess of meaningless merges). I think there are still a few things that should be addressed before the next release: * The static compilation of known_facts_dict is a problem * The speed of its generation can and must be improved a lot (in particular, to_int_repr is very inefficient) * There's no point in keeping the old DPLL implementation. Also, where did the _subs_atoms methods come from?? Ronan -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy-patches" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy-patc...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy-patches+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy-patches?hl=en.
