On Jan 1, 2008 4:08 PM, Kirill Smelkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Tue, Jan 01, 2008 at 03:56:26PM +0100, Ondrej Certik wrote: > > > > > Also, maybe let's write xfailing tests for reported issues *before* > > > fixing them? > > > > Why not. But I think if someone goes to write the test, he can as well > > fix it. :) > > Yes, but only later -- time is the issue. And one can always forget... > > So let's accept this practice?
Yes. But it's mainly important to use XFAIL for tests, that used to run but are not running anymore. For new tests it's not *that* important imho. These procedure should be documented on our wiki. http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/detail?id=559 Ondrej --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
