Also, I'm assuming we need to go through all of the Milestone-Release0.6.6 issues [1], and either fix them or postpone them. For example, I think we should see if we can fix the --random test failures (I narrowed one down in issue 1747), though some like 1244 will be best to just wait for the new assumptions in 0.7.
Let me know if you need me to review something or if you need help debugging something. I too have finals coming up, so hopefully I won't be too busy. Aaron Meurer [1] http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?q=label:Milestone-Release0.6.6 On Dec 6, 2009, at 7:35 AM, Vinzent Steinberg wrote: > If you want to help, you can have a look at the remaining patches to > be reviewed [1] or improve existing patches [2], thanks! > > Vinzent > > [1] http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?q=NeedsReview > [2] http://code.google.com/p/sympy/issues/list?q=NeedsBetterPatch > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
