Also, there are some doctest failures, which I think are just because
old functions need to be replaced with new ones. And the branch does
not work in Python 2.4 or 2.5:
Traceback (most recent call last):
File "bin/test", line 16, in <module>
import sympy
File "/Users/aaronmeurer/Documents/sympy/sympy/__init__.py", line
24, in <module>
from polys import *
File "/Users/aaronmeurer/Documents/sympy/sympy/polys/__init__.py",
line 3, in <module>
from polytools import (
File "/Users/aaronmeurer/Documents/sympy/sympy/polys/polytools.py",
line 1407
g = Poly(g, *f.gens, domain=f.get_domain())
^
SyntaxError: invalid syntax
I guess that syntax doesn't work until Python 2.6, so you will have to
use **kwargs.
Aaron Meurer
On Jan 14, 12:52 pm, Aaron Meurer <asmeu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I tried running this (from issue 1787) in the polys4 branch to see if it
> would come out better, and I got an error:
>
> import sympy as S
>
> for s in 'xyabcR':
> exec "%c=S.Symbol('%c')" % (s,s)
>
> ans=S.solve([x**2+y**2-R**2,a*x+b*y-c],x,y)
>
> print ans
>
> Just a heads up.
>
> Aaron Meurer
>
> On Jan 14, 2010, at 12:46 PM, Ondrej Certik wrote:
>
>
>
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 10:52 AM, Mateusz Paprocki <matt...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >> Hi,
>
> >> On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 03:27:27PM -0800, Ondrej Certik wrote:
> >>> Hi,
>
> >>> where is the latest polynomials branch? Is it here:
>
> >>> git://github.com/mattpap/sympy-polys.git polys4
>
> >>> ? Is there anything else besides documentation that needs to be improved?
>
> >>> I tried to rebase it to the latest master, but got dozens of
> >>> conflicts. Mateusz, what is your plan with the branch? Let's make a
> >>> plan and get it in. Let me know if you have time to rebase it, it
> >>> would take you less time than me.
>
> >>> I keep running into bugs, that are fixed in this branch, so we need it in.
>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Ondrej
>
> >> The latest polys branch is polys4, however I haven't rebased it yet
> >> after 0.6.6 release. When I will have some spare time I will create
> >> polys5 rebased branch.
>
> >> I would like to have new polynomials merged with master but
> >> still more tests are needed and we need to write documentation
> >> for the whole module.
>
> >> Now I'm busy at school, but after the 25th I will have time to
> >> finalize this module and merge it with master.
>
> > If we write doctests for your poly4 branch (from December) will it
> > make it harder for you to rebase it? If not, let me write the
> > documentation for it, at least something that I know how to document.
> > And then on 25th, you rebase it and we'll push it in.
>
> > Ondrej
> > --
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> > "sympy" group.
> > To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> > For more options, visit this group
> > athttp://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"sympy" group.
To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
