Hi all, hi Ondrej, hi Aaron ! I am still not using sympy for anything yet, but I'm following the list and sympy's development in general with great interest. Just recently a friend of mine started having to do some differential equations for her PhD thesis and got (back) into using Mathematica for it.
I remember, some time (years?) ago, Ondrej wrote a post here on the list, mentioning how he was browsing through an oldish Mathematica book noticing how many (little?) things there were left, where sympy could (or: would have to) improve on... I think at the time sympy started being able (using mpmath) to compute 1mio decimals of pi in a few seconds... So: How would you describe the state of sympy - maybe compared to Mathematica - today ? I guess, there a areas where sympy is already "better" than M. - quantum mechanics ... ? Could one say that the syntax is nicer ? Obviously, (I think) Mathematica's notebook is unsurpassed - but I guess, for that one could use Sage ... Thanks, Sebastian Haase -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sy...@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
