On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Felix Kaiser <felix.kai...@fxkr.net> wrote: > On 02/18/2011 03:39 PM, Chris Smith wrote: >> >> Vinzent Steinberg wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Anyone else have ideas along this line? >>>> >>>> I think it would make sense to create a directory in sympy for such >>>> stuff. "sympy/utilities" comes to my mind, but maybe it is already >>>> overloaded. Maybe "sympy/addons"? >>>> >>>> If people start using it a lot, it can be moved to the core. >>>> >> Maybe it could be >> >> sympy >> addons >> vks >> smichr >> asmeurer >> >> etc... Since different people might write routines with the same name and >> so namespace could keep these sorted. >> >> /c >> > The idea itself is definitely good, but those snippets would probably be > untested and unreviewed (if they were tested and reviewed, there would be no > reason not to add them directly into sympy). Do we really want such code in > the main repo? Maybe we should create a sympy-snippets repo instead?
Exactly. I think it doesn't belong to the main repo. I understand Chris' point though, and I think the solution is to get it into sympy proper, and I will reply in the other thread about this. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
