Hi, On 28 April 2011 17:06, Ondrej Certik <ond...@certik.cz> wrote:
> Hi, > > Should TableForm go into SymPy or not? Here is the pull request: > > https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/268 > > here is the discussion at length: > > https://groups.google.com/d/topic/sympy/RSOo5cZNd2E/discussion > > and here are the examples of usage of TableForm: > > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/RSOo5cZNd2E/8bLSGHqcdU4J > https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sympy/RSOo5cZNd2E/TWmxeR-0A3gJ > > I am +1 to have it in SymPy, Ronan is -1. What do other people think? > > > I guess the discussion is whether we want SymPy to contain all useful > code regarding symbolic manipulation, just like Mathematica has > (Mathematica has TableForm in by default). My vision is clearly yes. > But I would like to know the opinion of the sympy community. > I didn't look into the implementation yet, but anyway +1 for the idea. The question you formulated it broader than this and includes OEIS, physics, code generators etc. In my opinion all this should be in SymPy and moreover, this is how we (at least I, but I'm sure it's not only me) developed SymPy from the very beginning, so I don't see why we should change this direction now. > Ondrej > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > > Mateusz -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
