Maybe this will be useful for the project: http://www.nltk.org/
On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Joachim Durchholz <j...@durchholz.org> wrote: > Am 13.03.2012 15:51, schrieb Sergiu Ivanov: > >> On Tue, Mar 13, 2012 at 6:16 AM, Bharath M R<catchmrbhar...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Yeah I think I should use some parser generators. But doesn't it >>> introduce >>> a >>> dependency on the parser generator. Is it ok to have this dependency? >> >> >> Usually, you only use the parser generator to produce the code of the >> parser. This resulting code is technically independent of the parser >> generator. I'd think such (not that firm) dependency should be OK. > > > Hm... let me phrase it differently: > Those parsing methods that are so complicated that you need a parser > generator require a different skill set. Which means that we're raising the > entry barrier for contributors. > > Hence, -1. > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "sympy" group. > To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. > -- Jorge Eduardo Cardona jorgeecard...@gmail.com jorgeecardona.blogspot.com github.com/jorgeecardona ------------------------------------------------ Linux registered user #391186 Registered machine #291871 ------------------------------------------------ -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
