Wouldn't it be better to make it print using %. That would be universal, not just for Numpy (and it should therefore just be added to the LambdaPrinter).
Aaron Meurer On Feb 25, 2013, at 1:53 AM, G B <g.c.b.at.w...@gmail.com> wrote: I went and tried to lamdify an expression with a Mod operator using the "numpy" module, and it didn't like it. Is fixing this as easy as adding "Mod":"mod", to the NUMPY_TRANSLATIONS dictionary in utilities/lambdify.py? I just discovered lambdify, and now I can't stop using it for everything... I'd had my own implementation using a hacked together sequence of substitutions, solves and closures, but this is much more satisfying! Thanks-- Greg -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
