What is the output of git remote -v?

Aaron Meurer

On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 9:12 PM, Saurabh Jha <saurabh.j...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am not able to get "git pull" to work. It says it's already up-to-date,
> which I suspect it's not. Thus I am not able to get git rebase and git merge
> to work. Can anyone suggest some workaround for this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -Saurabh
>
>
> On Thursday, August 15, 2013 12:49:05 AM UTC+5:30, Saurabh Jha wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have added docstrings to my current work. Most of the work is complete
>> now as far as level 0 of dense matrix is concerned.
>>
>> I think this PR can now be reviewed. I am afraid that it will get more and
>> more difficult to review this thing with increasing code.
>>
>> Also there seems to be some conflicts currently. The tests pass in my
>> local computer but there seems to be some problem. Can anyone please help me
>> here?
>>
>> -Saurabh
>>
>> On Saturday, August 10, 2013 12:19:57 AM UTC+5:30, Saurabh Jha wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> My work is almost done as far as dense matrix is concerned[1]. I have now
>>> divided all the stuff into three files densearith, densetools and
>>> densesolve. Here are some key points--
>>>
>>> mulmatmat is not selecting rows and cols and multiplying them as done in
>>> the last commit. It turns out that col function is too expensive. So I just
>>> replaced it with the old workaround by applying zip on second matrix and
>>> then multiplying rows and cols. It seems that selecting a column is not very
>>> efficient in the new model. Not atleast in current col function.
>>> I am not able to apply domains on complex numbers.
>>> I have two functions lowertriangle and uppertriangle that, given a
>>> matrix, returns a upper triangle matrix and lower triangle matrix by having
>>> appropriate elements reduced to zeros by matrix operations. These were
>>> actually created to be used by some other functions but it didn't turned out
>>> to be used anywhere. I am not sure about the utility of them now. I feel
>>> they can be used in solving equations
>>> There is a test failure in the LU_inverse. The thing is it calculates the
>>> 0th and 2nd columns correctly but not the the first column. Others pass
>>> In some places like in LU, I have to use QQ(x)/QQ(y) to avoid the
>>> truncating of decimal part when the division is not perfect(e.g. 2.3 to 2).
>>> It does not seems to be the right way to do it. Anyone please see if there
>>> is some other way to do it.
>>> I think this level should be used as in the tests. Each each is forced to
>>> have a type
>>>
>>> best,
>>> -Saurabh
>>>
>>>
>>> [1] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2248
>>>
>>> On Monday, July 15, 2013 1:22:50 PM UTC+5:30, Saurabh Jha wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I have managed to implement a function to calculate rref of a matrix.
>>>> It's not using any particular reference, but it does seems to work.  Please
>>>> have a look[1]. I am now working on the final pieces of dense matrix, LU 
>>>> and
>>>> QR decompositions, inverse and determinant(relatively easy because of rref)
>>>> and a solve. I am also implement hessian and matrix derivatives.
>>>>
>>>> A very rough outline of solve is this--
>>>>
>>>> if we have some equations like--
>>>>
>>>> a1x + b1y + c1z = d (1)
>>>> a2x + b2y + c2z = d (2)
>>>> a3x + b3y + c3z = d (3)
>>>>
>>>> if ncol > nrow + 1, return underdetermined and return infinite solutions
>>>> checking with rowdiv, if (1), (2), (3) are complete multiples of each
>>>> other (both left hand side and right hand side), return infinite solutions
>>>> if (1), (2), (3)  are partial multiples(only left hand side), return no
>>>> solution.
>>>> else -- calculate rref and return solution.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The only concern is that rref is slower than older rref. The new
>>>> profiles can be found in [2]
>>>>
>>>> I am not sure if I have missed something. I would request others to
>>>> please point the functions I missed right now.
>>>>
>>>> [1] https://github.com/sympy/sympy/pull/2248
>>>> [2]
>>>> http://sympymatrix.blogspot.in/2013/07/profile-of-new-rref-function-and-some.htm
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to