On Fri, Jan 24, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Harsh Gupta <gupta.hars...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> Great to hear it. As noted on the ideas page, this one will require a
>>> good deal of thought to be done in the application, so let's start
>>> discussing.
>
> Thanks a lot, and sorry for the late reply
>
>>> Another thing I'd like to know is if there's literature on solving
>>> algorithms, particularly solving transcendental equations, and very
>>> particularly on if there are any complete algorithms out there for
>>> some class of equations.
>
> I found a old paper called "SOLVING SYMBOLIC EQUATIONS WITH PRESS"
> http://www.research.ed.ac.uk/portal/files/413486/Solving_Symbolic_Equations_%20with_PRESS.pdf
>
>>> Do we know how other computer algebra systems solve this problem?  How 
>>> robust are the algorithms behind wolframalpha.com ?
>
> I have found another paper "A Review of Symbolic Solvers"
> http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.44.9444&rep=rep1&type=pdf
> and according to it Mathematica performs performs pretty bad.

That was in 1996.

Nonetheless this, along with the Wester paper, should provide some
good test cases so we can see what can be done that we can't do.

Aaron Meurer

>
>>> An audit of the current solve code might be in order. In particular,
>>> I'd like to know:
>>>
>>> 1. what are the different "solvers"? (if we split solve into "hints"
>>> like with dsolve, these would be the different hints), and
>>> 2. which are algorithmically complete (i.e., we know they will give
>>> all solutions, or they can detect somehow if they may have missed
>>> one)?
>>>
>>> And this may raise auxiliary questions, like:
>>>
>>> - to what degree can the different solvers be separated? For instance,
>>> one solver (I'm not sure if it's actually implemented) would use
>>> decompose() to solve recursively. How would such "recursive solvers"
>>> look in a hints system?
>>>
>>> - of those that are heuristic (not algorithmically complete), can they
>>> be improved?
>
> I'm going through the solvers code and will answer these questions soon.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "sympy" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to