On Friday, 4 August 2017 17:34:25 UTC-4, Aaron Meurer wrote:
>
> You can try this, but I foresee problems reusing I=sqrt(-1) the complex 
> number as i the quaternion. Mathematically they aren't the same thing, but 
> even in terms of SymPy, ImaginaryUnit is burdened with things like 
> assumptions, which might cause issues with quaternions.
>

Implementing quaternions should be simple. Deciding how they interact with 
the rest of SymPy may be more complicated.


> And maybe even you could do something with the Mul processors to make them 
> auto-simplify, if that's what is desired.
>

I would suggest an immediate evaluation in this case.

Maybe a Quaternion class is the simplest way to implement quaternions.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"sympy" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to sympy+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to sympy@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/sympy.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/sympy/803df12b-57f4-4f3c-a82e-f7cdbf95d9d9%40googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to