"Alexander Bauer" <[email protected]> wrote on 6.1.2010 10:48:31: > >Hi Miha, Hi Alexander,
>what do you mean with collisions ? >Two different Message-IDs with the same Hash ? >In that case you should never get 2% collisions. If you re-read my message closely especially the part about my stats, you'll see that I wrote "Minimum is a zero about 2% of messages." That means that I have approx 2% of messages without the actual Message-Id. Also as you quoted The field is optional although if not present most of up to date mail servers will add it. >A hash over the hole header, is not a good Idea. Because if you get a message >twice from different Mailservers, you will not detect the duplicate. True. But I would still compare at least Date and From fields. Regards, Miha -- It's time to get rid of your current e-mail client ... ... and start using si.Mail. It's small & free. ( http://www.simail.si/ ) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Verizon Developer Community Take advantage of Verizon's best-in-class app development support A streamlined, 14 day to market process makes app distribution fast and easy Join now and get one step closer to millions of Verizon customers http://p.sf.net/sfu/verizon-dev2dev _______________________________________________ synalist-public mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synalist-public
