Tijs

Please go ahead with a JIRA and a patch

thanks
asankha

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think the proposal of Asankha is fine.
Everybody agrees?
Shall I make a JIRA call and come up with a patch for this?

Tijs

  
van: "Ruwan Linton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
datum: 2006/12/15 Fri AM 06:07:12 MET
aan: [email protected]
onderwerp: Re: WS-RM TerminateSequence message

+ for the solution proposed by asankha,

That is to have an optional scope attribute so that we can get rid of
putting all our local message properties to Axis2 MC which I dont see as a
good practice. It is also nice to specify the corelation as a scope....

Thanks,
Ruwan.

On 12/15/06, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
    
We use the local message properties, esp for the set-property mediator
and the getProperty() XPath function etc..

I propose that we modify the set-property mediator as follows:

<set-property name="string" (value="literal" | _expression_="xpath")
[scope=axis2|correlate]/>


Then we could use the same for correlations of messages as well..

asankha

Paul Fremantle wrote:
      
I think I prefer #1. If we aren't using the distinction between the
Synapse MC property and the Axis2 MC then maybe we should get rid of
it?

Paul

On 12/14/06, Asankha C. Perera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
        
 Tijs

 0.90 is now released. We could do another point release in January
and/or
prepare for 1.0. However I think quick release cycles would be good
for us -
and hence your fix should become available soon.

 From the proposed solutions, I prefer option 2... and if you would
like to
do this enhancement, you are most welcome

 asankha


 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Paul,

I think optiion 1 would be the most effective one.
If this is not possible, option 2 is a good alternative.
Do you think this can be resolved before release version 0.90?
It would be a bit disappointing if the WS-RM support is not fully
working in
version 0.90.
I have some time to help out if this is helpful.

Tijs



 van: "Paul Fremantle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
datum: 2006/12/14 Thu PM 06:21:39 MET
aan: [email protected]
onderwerp: Re: WS-RM TerminateSequence message

Tijs

I figured out what's going on. Although our MessageContext is a
mapping onto the underlying Axis2 MC, we have our own properties too.
So when we set-property, that doesn't get reflected in the underlying
Axis2 MC, so it doesn't affect Sandesha2.

Three simple options I can see:

1) get rid of our properties and just have the axis2 mc properties..
If a user wants to avoid overwriting an underlying axis2 property,
just make sure this has a unique name. I don't think we actually use
this feature but maybe I'm wrong.
2) add a set-axis2-property which modifies the underlying axis2
property.
3) add a specific lastmessage mediator.

Thoughts everyone?

Paul

On 12/14/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 Paul,

Has there been some progression with the WS-Reliable Messaging last
message
for the termination of the sequence?

Thanks,

Tijs


Tijs

You are quite right. The set-property isn't working. I'm just
debugging it.
The property should be going right through to the sandesha module
which is why you can't find the code in Synapse.


Paul

On 12/8/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:


 Paul,

I have tried to use the set-property element, but I don't see any
change in
the WS-RM

 handling.


 Where exactly does the set-property needs to be set in the Synapse
          
flow
      
configuration

 file?



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



 --
Paul Fremantle
VP/Technology, WSO2 and OASIS WS-RX TC Co-chair

http://bloglines.com/blog/paulfremantle
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

"Oxygenating the Web Service Platform", www.wso2.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]




---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional
commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
          
        
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


      
    


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



  
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to