On Tue, Aug 13, 2013 at 12:13 PM, Deb Richardson <[email protected]> wrote:
> ----- Original Message ----- > > I'm not arguing that our users don't deserve this. My question is whether > > it's > > part of MVP. I.e., if our users are actually better served by not having > > the existing bad sync delayed until this feature is done. ISTM that if > > Chrome doesn't have this, that's a pretty strong argument that it's not > > actually minimum > > Is adding a page where users can get more information about the feature > going to require significant engineering time? I'm literally talking about > a page of text that users can read at this point, nothing more. > Well, it's nonzero, and I thought we were trying to define the minimum here. -Ekr
_______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
