----- Original Message ----- > > The existing Sync UI demonstrates quite clearly that a "simple" solution > > can fail to meet user expectations as well as carrying with it additional > > engineering costs and bugs.
> I haven't seen the evidence or data to know conclusively whether this is a > One Size Fits Few or One Size Fits Many situation. Can you point me at > something that suggests it's One Size Fits Few? > For example, these would be helpful: % of users in existing Sync that have > changed the default elections, or a substantial number of SUMO requests that > suggest users are confused by the election datatype election UI or decline > to use Sync because the UI doesn't meet their use cases. Given how buried the existing Sync checkboxes are in multi-level dialog boxes, I think it would be fairly easy to guess about the results. As for SUMO, that would be interesting. I found over 1000 pages of Community Discussion posts when I searched for "sync options" and a quick look at the first 3 pages found 3 or 4 posts that could have been helped with a better understanding of controlling the data that was synced.
_______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
