During my cleanup, I found some bugs I was not sure about.

ckarlof, markh, others: are the following bugs in scope/necessary for
29? (i.e. should these bugs block bug 969593?)

- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=951373 per-client sync
options (seems like Android made this switch, so we need to as well?)
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=943521 onepw protocol
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=959034 409 Conflict handling
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=960346 use "new format
assertions"
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=963835 handle incorrect
case in emails

These bugs seem like they might involve UI changes, which we can't
easily do at this point:
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=945449 support for auth
server back-off protocol
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=958447 token server back-off
- https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=927527 support for
"over-quota" notification

Gavin

On Fri, Feb 7, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Gavin Sharp <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello syncers,
>
> Apologies for the bugspam many of you no doubt received, but I've done
> some work cleaning up our bug lists.
>
> We'd previously been using bug 905997 (along with bug 951296,
> confusingly) as a catch-all for all issues related to desktop
> accounts-based Sync. The dependency list included a mix of 29-relevant
> bugs and non-29-relevant bugs.
>
> I'd like to have everyone on the same page about which bugs we are
> trying to address in Firefox 29, and which we are not.
>
> So:
>
> - I've filed bug 969593 to track account-based Sync bugs that we
> intend to address in Firefox 29. This list should only include bugs
> that are in client code (i.e. that would be fixed in what is now
> mozilla-aurora).
>
> - I've filed bug 969626 to track Firefox 29-relevant Sync issues that
> affect desktop, but that are not client issues (i.e. issues with the
> about:accounts "jelly", the auth/token/other servers, etc.)
>
> We should be aggressive in keeping the dependency list of bug 969593
> to a minimum, and we should be aggressive in getting the bugs there
> resolved quickly. I intend to be watching this list very closely.
>
> (Bug 905997 remains open as a non-29-specific general tracker, but I
> don't expect it to be very useful in the longer term.)
>
> Gavin
_______________________________________________
Sync-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev

Reply via email to