On 27/09/2014 2:53 AM, James Bonacci wrote: > Well, this sure looks good.
Heh, it's certainly re-assuring as a sanity-check. But I did very deliberately put in this disclaimer: > I'm not entirely sure how to interpret the measures here, and we > probably should be measuring something like "user saw an error bar" more > directly. For example, I don't know whether an early FxA failure would error out before triggering WEAVE_START_COUNT. I'll poke at the code a bit and file some bugs for more deliberate measurement of error conditions here. Ryan > But it's interesting to compare: > > http://telemetry.mozilla.org/#filter=nightly%2F34%2FWEAVE_START_COUNT > > http://telemetry.mozilla.org/#filter=nightly%2F34%2FWEAVE_COMPLETE_SUCCESS_COUNT > > > For "release32" I see: > > 36.05M started, 35.62M completed successfully (98.8%) > > For "nightly34" I see: > > 5.26M started, 5.18M completed successfully (98.4%) > > > Cheers, > > Ryan > _______________________________________________ > Sync-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev > _______________________________________________ Sync-dev mailing list [email protected] https://mail.mozilla.org/listinfo/sync-dev
