On Thu, 2008-07-17 at 18:13 +0100, Jonny Lamb wrote: > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 09:48:11AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > They're not hard to use from the packager's perspective, but they screw > > up the versioning forever more (to a casual glance it will look like > > it's version 0.2, but it's 'really' version 1:0.2, and that's what > > you'll have to use for comparisons) as it can't ever be removed again. > > That's why we avoid the use of epochs wherever possible. > > Well, sorry to be harsh, but this is just not my problem. You ignored > the version number for some unspecified reason.
Thanks for the selective quoting: it was hardly unspecified. The very next paragraph explained that it was just a mistake. -- adamw ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the Moblin Your Move Developer's challenge Build the coolest Linux based applications with Moblin SDK & win great prizes Grand prize is a trip for two to an Open Source event anywhere in the world http://moblin-contest.org/redirect.php?banner_id=100&url=/ _______________________________________________ SynCE-Devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/synce-devel
