> We'll need to add something to the API, I guess. Status "running" could > be divided into "processing" and "waiting"? Good, I like this idea to tell users more information about status. But should we give more detailed information, such as 'checking data in the evolution(backend)', 'send data to server', 'waiting for server response', 'receive data from server', 'apply data to backend' and others?
Cheers, Yongsheng -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Patrick Ohly Sent: Tuesday, September 01, 2009 11:19 PM To: Jussi Kukkonen Cc: SyncEvolution Subject: Re: [SyncEvolution] spinner use in sync-ui On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 15:44 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > We'll need to add something to the API, I guess. Status "running" could > be divided into "processing" and "waiting"? Yes, that should work. -- Best Regards Patrick Ohly Senior Software Engineer Intel GmbH Open Source Technology Center Hermuelheimer Strasse 8a Phone: +49-2232-2090-30 50321 Bruehl Fax: +49-2232-2090-29 Germany _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
