On Tue, 2009-09-01 at 20:51 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > Patrick Ohly wrote: > > Setting sync modes in the Sync() method is a special case for a more > > general problem (temporarily overriding the config). My thinking was > > that we need a solution for that general problem (do we?) and then the > > special case is no longer needed. But the special case is so common, > > perhaps it really deserves special treatment? > > I note I didn't comment on this at all yet... Probably because I haven't > understood the need: What are the other (client side) use cases of > temporarily overriding parts of the config? I can't really think of > anything.
For example doing a single sync run with increased log level. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
