On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:51 +0100, Sascha Peilicke wrote: > On Tuesday 08 June 2010 17:17:42 you wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-06-04 at 17:31 +0100, Sascha Peilicke wrote: > > On the other hand, some new methods and signals were not annotated yet > > by Carl. Further patches for those are welcome. > > > > > Also I had to change the parameter name 'template' of the GetConfig() and > > > GetConfigs() methods of the session and server definition as this is a > > > keyword in C++ and won't compile. I simply changed it to 'templates' > > > (patch attached). > > > > That's also in Carl's patch, except that he renamed it to "tmplate". > This maybe nit-picky but 'templates' maybe more appropriate, as the intend is > to return a list of strings.
But it only returns one config or template, never more than one. So I still think singular "tmplate" is appropriate. About installing the .xml files in /usr/share/dbus-1/interfaces, does that still make sense? For example, which files should get installed - with or without <annotation>, or both under different names? What about <doc:*>? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
