On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 07:20 -0700, Pietro Battiston wrote: > Il giorno mar, 07/09/2010 alle 14.28 +0200, Patrick Ohly ha scritto: > > On Tue, 2010-09-07 at 02:39 -0700, Pietro Battiston wrote: > > > Moreover, I would ensure that the words "Syncevolution", or at least > > > "Evolution", appear in "Name" or "Comment", since currently if one has a > > > crowded applications menu it can be non-trivial to find it. > > > > So what do you suggest? > > > > [Desktop Entry] > > _Name=SyncEvolution (GTK) > > _Comment=Synchronize PIM data > > Maybe without "(GTK)" - in the end, launchers are for graphic apps, and > the particular library used is not something the average user is > particularly interested in. > > If you feel that there is need to avoid possible future ambiguity,
Yes, I think there is such a need (there might be KDE GUI soonish), and ... > maybe > "for Gnome" would be scrictly speaking less appropriate, but more > understandable. ... yes, this is not quite correct. As long as KDE doesn't have a "native" GUI, they'll use sync-ui. Taking all of this into account I still think that "SyncEvolution (GTK)" is the least evil of the alternatives. > By the way: now that syncevolution works also without any third-party > server, I guess the category "network" is not very appropriate, and I > would replace it with > "Utility;GTK" > or > "Office;PDA;GTK" I like "Office;PDA". Not sure about "GTK". I don't find it in http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html and which toolkit it uses shouldn't be relevant for the menu. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
