On Wed, 2010-09-08 at 09:04 +0100, Jussi Kukkonen wrote: > On 09/07/2010 06:42 PM, Patrick Ohly wrote: [GTK too technical] > That said I don't have any smart ideas for a good name so your "least > evil" point stands: "SyncEvolution (GTK)" is certainly acceptable and > shouldn't be much work for translators.
I agree, but as I don't have a better idea I'll stick to "SyncEvolution (GTK)". > >> By the way: now that syncevolution works also without any > >> third-party server, I guess the category "network" is not very > >> appropriate, and I would replace it with > >> "Utility;GTK" > >> or > >> "Office;PDA;GTK" > > > > I like "Office;PDA". Not sure about "GTK". I don't find it in > > http://standards.freedesktop.org/menu-spec/latest/apa.html and which > > toolkit it uses shouldn't be relevant for the menu. > > Pietro mentioned it's there in the list, but stuff outside the Main > categories is mostly not used anywhere (there are some exceptions like > *Game)... Can't hurt to add both "PDA" and "GTK" I guess. "Office" > definitely sounds like the best choice for main category nowadays. Right, I had missed GTK in the list. I'll go with Office;PDA;GTK -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
