On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 23:01 +0100, [email protected] wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 10, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I've made binaries of the current SyncEvolution development snapshot
> > available. You can get them from the "experimental" apt repository
> > (.deb) and http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/evolution/
> > (.rpm).
> >
> > Instead of the previous "alpha" or "beta" denominators as part of the
> > version name, I've switched to the rpm method of "next version minus 1
> > in the last position". So this snapshot is version 1.0.99.6 (> 1.0.x for
> > any kind of realistic x, < 1.1). The .6 stems from the fact that there
> > have been earlier snapshots in MeeGo.
> 
> Any reason why there's not a source tar ball to go with the binary releases?

Ah, caught guilty. The only reason is that I didn't bother, because
anyone interested in source code at this point is better of pulling
directly from the "master" branches in the git repos.

But now there's also a .tar.gz.

-- 
Best Regards, Patrick Ohly

The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although
I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way
represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak
on behalf of Intel on this matter.


_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to