On Mon, 2010-09-13 at 18:24 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Patrick Ohly <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-09-10 at 23:01 +0100, [email protected] wrote: > >> Any reason why there's not a source tar ball to go with the binary > >> releases? > > > > Ah, caught guilty. The only reason is that I didn't bother, because > > anyone interested in source code at this point is better of pulling > > directly from the "master" branches in the git repos. > > > > But now there's also a .tar.gz. > > I maybe going blind as I still don't see one there.
http://downloads.syncevolution.org/syncevolution/sources/syncevolution-1.0.99.6.tar.gz The ordering is a bit awkward. Perhaps I should move away the "alpha" and "beta" releases into a sub-folder "archives" to align the alphabetically sorted files with release order? -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
