Il 08/11/2010 11:19, Patrick Ohly ha scritto: > On Mo, 2010-11-08 at 09:43 +0000, Giancarlo wrote: > >> I'm trying to keep in sync two phones with my evolution, by using >> syncevolution. >> >> My phones are a Nokia E61 and a Nokia 6220 classic. Both are S60, but E61 is >> older than 6220. >> >> It happens to me quite often that after a sync I get data duplication, most >> often on the E61. The only way I found to get rid of such duplication would >> be >> to sync one-way from the server to the phone and then to re-sync immediately, >> again one-way, from the phone to the server. In such a way, the next two-way >> sync would work. >> > It is not clear to me why you need a "refresh-from-client" sync > immediately after the "refresh-from-server". Everything should be ready > for a normal two-way sync after "refresh-from-server". What happens if > you don't do the "refresh-from-client"? > >
I'm sorry for not being clear enough. Yes, I meant a "refresh-from-client" sync immediately after the "refresh-from-server" If I don't do this, after the refresh-from-server the next two-way will duplicate all the entries. This is definitely strange but it does happen. >> But after such an adjustment, there will be very likely the same problem with >> the second phone, so to recover I will have to do the same with the second >> phone. And this will lead to problems with the first, and so on. >> > The problem with "refresh-from-client" is that it wipes out all data on > the server. The next sync with your other phone therefore has to delete > all contacts on that phone, which will lead to conflicts if that data > was modified there in the meantime. > > Yes I fully understand that. And I agree, this is a crazy way to sync. >> In brief, the only way to keep all in order is to sync two-way one phone and >> one-way the other. Therefore I can never change my PIM data from the phone >> which >> I sync one way: such changes wuould be lost at the first sync. >> >> I'm not sure whether this is a regression: I do remember that everything >> looked >> fine before the last two versions of syncevolution, even though I had other >> problems (which are described in the wiki). >> >> Anyone has ever tested syncing with two different phones? >> > I haven't tested it much, but it should work as far as SyncEvolution is > concerned. > > Yes, it seems to be a problem arising due to some interaction between the synchronization process and the two phones, which belong to two different generations of S60. Please note that I'm definitely one of the worst cases you can ever meet: my data, during almost 10 years, have passed through two different Palm PDAs, two HPs (actually the first was a Compaq), 3 Nokia. Therefore the data might have extremely strange entries due to the different formats. On the pc side, I used the Palm conduit under Linux for the Palm's, SynCE for the HP's, opensync and finally syncevolution for the 3 Nokia's. Now I'm expecting a final solution from MeeGo, as soon as it comes out on a phone. I cannot fix everything by hand, so I have to rely on robust software. Thank you for your help. giancarlo -- -- ------------------------------------------------- Dr. Giancarlo Iannizzotto, PhD Associate Professor DiSIA - Dipartimento di Scienze per l'Ingegneria e per l'Architettura, Faculty of Engineering, University of Messina - ITALY - http://visilab.unime.it/~ianni elm: [email protected] elm: [email protected] PGP PUBLIC KEY: http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xF1A96309 phone: +39 0903977327 --- -------------------------------------------------- "Let us leave this God of Pointland to the ignorant fruition of his omnipresence and omniscience: nothing that you or I can do can rescue him from his self-satisfaction." Flatland, Section 20. --------------------------------------------------
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
