On Di, 2010-11-09 at 18:08 +0000, Giancarlo wrote: > Giancarlo Iannizzotto <ia...@...> writes: > > > > It is not clear to me why you need a "refresh-from-client" sync > > > immediately after the "refresh-from-server". Everything should be ready > > > for a normal two-way sync after "refresh-from-server". What happens if > > > you don't do the "refresh-from-client"? > > > > > > > > Sorry for replying to my own email: I just want to be more clear. > The issue I described above does not appear _always_ but just sometimes- > I would say, often. I could not understand why it happens. > When the problem does not show up, then the two-way sync works for both > phones. > When it shows up, then I get this ping-pong and it goes on for a while, > then it disappears after a number of refresh-from-server and > refresh-from-client syncs. > I'm still trying to recognise a pattern in this behaviour.
I suggest that you disable deleting of session directories (with maxlogdirs=0) and enable more detailed logging (with loglevel=4) for both phones. Then when something happens, it is possible to review the logs, both from the session where a problem was noticed and the previous one. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list [email protected] http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
