On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote:
> On Mi, 2012-01-18 at 16:55 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote:
>> I've renamed my branch to concurrent-sync-sessions and rebased onto
>> master. I'm now going through and making required changes to get tests
>> to work.
>
> Note that I pushed another change onto a new "signal-handling" branch.
> This affects you because syncevo-dbus-server will have to relay
> suspend/abort requests. The helper process will have to deal with
> signals similar to syncevo-local-sync helper in that branch.
>
> Do these changes make sense?
>

Yes, this looks fine.

btw, I noticed when looking through this the the copyright dates for
SuspendFlags.cpp are old.

Cheers,
Chris
_______________________________________________
SyncEvolution mailing list
SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org
http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution

Reply via email to