On So, 2012-01-15 at 12:09 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 3:08 PM, Patrick Ohly <patrick.o...@intel.com> wrote: > > On Mi, 2012-01-11 at 14:59 +0100, Chris Kühl wrote: > >> This will very much be an issue with GIO GDBus as it uses the same > >> mechanism. Looking that the souce of libdbus and gdbus leads me to > >> believe using signals on a non-bus connection doesn't really make > >> sense. I just use method calls in this case. > > > > Indeed, registering signal subscribers isn't very useful when there is > > always exactly one recipient. > > > > I've got SignalWatch activation working with one-to-one connections. > Just have to forgo adding the match rule.
Is that also going to be possible with GDBus GIO? If not, then we will have a problem once code depends on signals and we want to switch to GDBus GIO. -- Best Regards, Patrick Ohly The content of this message is my personal opinion only and although I am an employee of Intel, the statements I make here in no way represent Intel's position on the issue, nor am I authorized to speak on behalf of Intel on this matter. _______________________________________________ SyncEvolution mailing list SyncEvolution@syncevolution.org http://lists.syncevolution.org/listinfo/syncevolution
