Thanks Bill.

I've submitted two new Feed URLs, and added a note to the old 
FeedIDs.

132712 is redirected to 355163.
165781 is redirected to 355164.

Nick


--- In [email protected], "Bill Kearney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> The way feeds are handled is based entirely on their data URL.  
The site URL
> isn't a factor in how the site detects and downloads feeds.  The 
site URL is
> only used during the periodic collection of additional metadata.  
This
> because RSS itself lacks the ability (across all versions) to 
express extra
> metadata.   That and the metadata for it, even when properly 
namespaced in
> the feed, wouldn't be picked up by that many reader programs 
anyway (and
> would thus just waste bandwidth).
> 
> So if a feed moves to a new data URL then it gets treated as an 
entirely new
> feed.  The old one is then marked as a 'Redirect' to the new feed 
ID.  (This
> is a manual process an editor provides).  This way anything that 
went
> looking for the old URL would be able to find the new one.
> 
> Likewise, the feed info data shown is pulled from the feed 
itself.  So if a
> description or other data changes the system will pull it from 
there.
> There's no manual editing of these fields.  This is also not an 
automatic
> process as a way to prevent the sort of search engine gaming we 
all despise.
> A feed's description is generally expected to remain 'stable' over 
time, not
> change on all that frequent a basis.
> 
> As to the question at hand, the correct procedure is to submit the 
new URLs
> and point the old feeds to their new IDs.
> 
> -Bill Kearney
> Syndic8.com
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Both of the Feed URLs return 404, so I suggested changing them to
> > that specified at the Site URL.  (Looking at the Poll Results, it
> > seems likely the site amended the Feed URL on or around March 
20th.)
> >
> > On second thoughts, in this scenario, should we update the 
original
> > FeedID, or create a new FeedID and redirect the old to the new?  
I
> > guess the latter, as the feed will need to build up new stats 
before
> > being eligible for approval.  If somebody can confirm this 
approach,
> > I'll go ahead and create two new FeedIDs, and redirect the old to
> > the new.





------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor --------------------~--> 
What would our lives be like without music, dance, and theater?
Donate or volunteer in the arts today at Network for Good!
http://us.click.yahoo.com/Tcy2bD/SOnJAA/cosFAA/IRislB/TM
--------------------------------------------------------------------~-> 

If you're getting "too much mail" then send a message to:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(this will tell it to stop sending you mail)

To change your membership use THIS WEB PAGE: 
http://finance.groups.yahoo.com/group/syndic8/join
(here you can set your mail to digest, no mail or LEAVE the list)

To find more info about Syndicated XML newsfeeds visit http://www.syndic8.com/ 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/syndic8/

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 



Reply via email to