Sorry, here's the right file for rbldnsd: https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/rbldnsd/manifests/master/setup.pp
On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:04 PM, Geoffrey Corey <cor...@apache.org> wrote: > Follow up: > > KAM.cf is update daily, as is the sa-update command being run: > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deployment/modules/ > spamassassin/manifests/spamd.pp#L191-L202 > > Also, rbldnsd is setup already to send data to the mx hosts: > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/ > deployment/modules/rbldnsd/manifests/init.pp From this, you should be > able to see which services are pulled from. > > That being said, it might be worthwhile for us to check out the spamc/d > cluster to make sure the rbl checks being performaed aren't being blocked > for some reason. > > If you have more suggestions on what to edit (or want to see any more > compiled/rendered config files, happy to get that information). > > > On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 7:07 PM, Geoffrey Corey <cor...@apache.org> wrote: > >> yeah, a jira for tracking this would be good. >> >> Iirc the KAM.cf is updated using from, however I'm unsure of the >> frequency (the puppet manifest linked should be able to show this) >> >> On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 9:21 AM Kevin A. McGrail < >> kevin.mcgr...@mcgrail.com> wrote: >> >>> On 8/9/2017 11:34 AM, Geoffrey Corey wrote: >>> > It's been a while since I looked, but our spamassassin setup is using >>> > your KAM.cf file: >>> > https://github.com/apache/infrastructure-puppet/blob/deploym >>> ent/modules/spamassassin/manifests/spamd.pp#L16 >>> > >>> > >>> > As for the RBLs, I know we use some of it, and I indeed worked to fix >>> > dns on the spamassassin cluster to not be blocked from the RBLs. >>> > >>> > Unsure what the status now is of the spamassassin cluster though. >>> >>> Well getting the RBLs local will save a lot of query time if I had to >>> guess. >>> >>> And the KAM.cf should be updated a few times a week. >>> >>> Anyway, happy to help. I can open a ticket if you like, perhaps? >>> >>> >
