Hege broke it is my new bumper sticker. On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, 10:38 Henrik K <h...@hege.li> wrote:
> > Btw I grepped all update tarballs for the last year and it has been always > this way > > ./1864366/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 0.001 > 0.001 0.001 0.001 > ./1864366/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 0.001 > 0.001 0.001 0.001 > ... > ./1880477/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL 0.001 > 0.001 0.001 0.001 > ./1880477/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 0.001 > 0.001 0.001 0.001 > > So please let's stop assuming every single thing is result of the > migration. :-D > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > Oh yes, the change one thing and wait 2 weeks... > > > > > > On 7/29/2020 3:21 PM, Henrik K wrote: > > > Juat have to wait and see what next weekend rescore does for net. I > ran > > > many extra runs last time fixing things, who knows what happened.. > > > > > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:52:17PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote: > > >> Henrik, might be something broken on the new system. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- > > >> Subject: Re: Mailspike rules all return 0.0 > > >> Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:38:37 -0400 > > >> From: Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com> > > >> Reply-To: us...@spamassassin.apache.org > > >> To: us...@spamassassin.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> On 29 Jul 2020, at 9:27, Simon Harwood wrote: > > >> > > >>> Hello, > > >>> > > >>> I have noticed that the mailspike rules are enabled in SpamAssasin > but > > >>> all return zero values: > > >>> > > >>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted > > >>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5) > > >> This is actually a rounding issue: all RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_* rules are > being > > >> scored at +/- 0.001 by RuleQA so the score report rounds it to 0.0. > They > > >> are rescored that way because they are not hitting anything in the > > >> submitted corpora but have scores set in the static scores list. > > >> > > >> That MAY indicate a bug in RuleQA, since I don't believe that "net" > > >> rules like these should be rescored by RuleQA. Perhaps someone more > > >> familiar with the mechanics of RuleQA will correct me... > > >> > > >> > > >>> Please can you tell me where in the SpamAssassin configuration I find > > >>> the setting(s) that need to be changed such that non-zero values are > > >>> returned. > > >>> I have been receiving large quantities of spam that instead of just > > >>> being flagged as spam would have met the conditions for being > rejected > > >>> completely if either of the mailspike values had been 0.1 or greater. > > >> As Claudio said, local.cf is the place. Where your local.cf should be > > >> depends on how your SpamAssassin was built, but there should be a > > >> baseline version in the site rules directory. You can find that with: > > >> > > >> spamassassin --lint -D config 2>&1 |grep 'site rules dir' > > >> > > >> > > >> -- > > >> Bill Cole > > >> b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org > > >> (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses) > > >> Not For Hire (currently) > > >> > > -- > > Kevin A. McGrail > > kmcgr...@apache.org > > > > Member, Apache Software Foundation > > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project > > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171 >
