BTW, That was sarcasm.  I am worried about rule generation and the box
switchover so I apologize if it seems accusatory.  Just trying to dial what
is/is not working and why. :-)
--
Kevin A. McGrail
Member, Apache Software Foundation
Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171


On Sun, Aug 2, 2020 at 11:36 AM Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@apache.org>
wrote:

> Hege broke it is my new bumper sticker.
>
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2020, 10:38 Henrik K <h...@hege.li> wrote:
>
>>
>> Btw I grepped all update tarballs for the last year and it has been
>> always this way
>>
>> ./1864366/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL                     0.001
>> 0.001 0.001 0.001
>> ./1864366/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5                     0.001
>> 0.001 0.001 0.001
>> ...
>> ./1880477/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL                     0.001
>> 0.001 0.001 0.001
>> ./1880477/72_scores.cf:score RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5                     0.001
>> 0.001 0.001 0.001
>>
>> So please let's stop assuming every single thing is result of the
>> migration. :-D
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 03:27:36PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> > Oh yes, the change one thing and wait 2 weeks...
>> >
>> >
>> > On 7/29/2020 3:21 PM, Henrik K wrote:
>> > > Juat have to wait and see what next weekend rescore does for net.  I
>> ran
>> > > many extra runs last time fixing things, who knows what happened..
>> > >
>> > > On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 02:52:17PM -0400, Kevin A. McGrail wrote:
>> > >> Henrik, might be something broken on the new system.
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> > >> Subject:   Re: Mailspike rules all return 0.0
>> > >> Date:      Wed, 29 Jul 2020 12:38:37 -0400
>> > >> From:      Bill Cole <sausers-20150...@billmail.scconsult.com>
>> > >> Reply-To:  us...@spamassassin.apache.org
>> > >> To:        us...@spamassassin.apache.org
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> On 29 Jul 2020, at 9:27, Simon Harwood wrote:
>> > >>
>> > >>> Hello,
>> > >>>
>> > >>> I have noticed that the mailspike rules are enabled in SpamAssasin
>> but
>> > >>> all return zero values:
>> > >>>
>> > >>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_BL Mailspike blacklisted
>> > >>> 0.0 RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_L5 RBL: Very bad reputation (-5)
>> > >> This is actually a rounding issue: all RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_* rules are
>> being
>> > >> scored at +/- 0.001 by RuleQA so the score report rounds it to 0.0.
>> They
>> > >> are rescored that way because they are not hitting anything in the
>> > >> submitted corpora but have scores set in the static scores list.
>> > >>
>> > >> That MAY indicate a bug in RuleQA, since I don't believe that "net"
>> > >> rules like these should be rescored by RuleQA. Perhaps someone more
>> > >> familiar with the mechanics of RuleQA will correct me...
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >>> Please can you tell me where in the SpamAssassin configuration I
>> find
>> > >>> the setting(s) that need to be changed such that non-zero values are
>> > >>> returned.
>> > >>> I have been receiving large quantities of spam that instead of just
>> > >>> being flagged as spam would have met the conditions for being
>> rejected
>> > >>> completely if either of the mailspike values had been 0.1 or
>> greater.
>> > >> As Claudio said, local.cf is the place. Where your local.cf should
>> be
>> > >> depends on how your SpamAssassin was built, but there should be a
>> > >> baseline version in the site rules directory. You can find that with:
>> > >>
>> > >> spamassassin --lint -D config 2>&1 |grep 'site rules dir'
>> > >>
>> > >>
>> > >> --
>> > >> Bill Cole
>> > >> b...@scconsult.com or billc...@apache.org
>> > >> (AKA @grumpybozo and many *@billmail.scconsult.com addresses)
>> > >> Not For Hire (currently)
>> > >>
>> > --
>> > Kevin A. McGrail
>> > kmcgr...@apache.org
>> >
>> > Member, Apache Software Foundation
>> > Chair Emeritus Apache SpamAssassin Project
>> > https://www.linkedin.com/in/kmcgrail - 703.798.0171
>>
>

Reply via email to