> > 2) Is there another charter under which the working group would better > be able to make progress?
I believe the answer to this is yes. There is very relevant work this group could do and should do. If you look at what the community at large has done with implementing syslog in recent years, the only conclusion that you can draw is that what it has been doing, apart from 3164, has been quite distant from what this should have been doing. Darren _______________________________________________ Syslog mailing list Syslog@lists.ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog