> 
> 2) Is there another charter under which the working group would better
>    be able to make progress?

I believe the answer to this is yes.

There is very relevant work this group could do and should do.

If you look at what the community at large has done with implementing
syslog in recent years, the only conclusion that you can draw is that
what it has been doing, apart from 3164, has been quite distant from
what this should have been doing.

Darren

_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog

Reply via email to