Miao Fuyou wrote:
Yes, maybe it is favorable to have Syslog over TCP and Syslog over DTLS for
Syslog working group. But, there will be several transport documents for the
working group:
1, Syslog over UDP, already there and favorable for implementers
2, Syslog over TCP, what is the benefit?
3, Syslog over TLS
4, Syslog over DTLS, I reckon implementer would like it, but does IESG
satisfy to this transport?
With so many transport, implementer will be puzzled. Which is recommended by
the working group? The current ones are option 1 and 3.
Or what about syslog using GSSAPI since that would allow Kerberos or a
DTLS based GSSAPI mechanism.
--
Darren J Moffat
_______________________________________________
Syslog mailing list
Syslog@lists.ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/syslog
