On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:22:06 +0200, Michał Piotrowski <mkkp...@gmail.com> wrote: > W dniu 3 kwietnia 2011 23:11 użytkownik Bruno Wolff III > <br...@wolff.to> napisał: > > On Sun, Apr 03, 2011 at 23:05:52 +0200, > > Michał Piotrowski <mkkp...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> Of course it will be the best solution. But I doubt it will happen in > >> a next few weeks - so some temporary workaround for F15 would be > >> appreciated. It seems to me that this is a too serious problem to > >> release F15 without fixing/workarounding it somehow. > > > > tempfs is backed by swap, so this shouldn't be that big of a deal. > > I filled free space on /run and I was not able to start services. So I > guess that it might be a problem on some systems. ()
I was thinking of the case where it was spilt into two. You are correct, the current situation isn't good. > > Local > > users have other ways to try to kill system performance. > > > > Yes, but it is not about performance - IMO in some cases it may be > qualified as local DoS. You are right, I was thinking of where there was a separate tmpfs for the /run/user directory and there could be a lot of memory pressure, but system services would still be able to run. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel