2012/10/11 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > On Wed, 10.10.12 12:48, Marti Raudsepp (ma...@juffo.org) wrote: > >> >> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 8:22 PM, Jan Engelhardt <jeng...@inai.de> wrote: >> >>and how they should do this after the change that there >> >>is no flag? dispaly a RANDOM line? >> > >> > That is a possibility. Based upon that you are only interested >> > in the device anyway, I conclude the mountpoint is irrelevant. >> >> I didn't read the whole thread so maybe this has already been proposed, >> but... >> 1) we want df to show space usage by disk >> 2) we want df to show mount points >> 3) the mapping from disks to mount points is one-to-many >> >> Why not just collect all the relevant mount points on one line, for >> each disk? This way we don't throw away any information, but prevent >> repeating redundant information that's always the same for each disk. > > This comes very close to what I suggested, except that I suggested > ellipsation before listing too many mount points per entry.
why not fix df > > Lennart > > -- > Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. > _______________________________________________ > systemd-devel mailing list > systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel