On Sat, 03.11.12 21:52, Oleksii Shevchuk (alx...@gmail.com) wrote: > If checked, the unit with this rule should start all > conflicted units, that were successfuly stopped on starting
What precisely is the usecase for this one? Doesn't this patch do more than you suggest it would do? What i mean: if A and B conflict, and neither is running, and you then start B and stop it again with this new option set, wouldnt that start A even if it wasn't running before? Is that desirable? I really wonder if we can find a nicer way to solve this. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
