> What precisely is the usecase for this one? http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/systemd-devel/2012-November/007479.html
I use it to restore previous state after going to alternate state, like powersaving. > Doesn't this patch do more than you suggest it would do? What i mean: if > A and B conflict, and neither is running, and you then start B and stop > it again with this new option set, wouldnt that start A even if it > wasn't running before? Is that desirable? It wouldn't start A in that case. Separate list in current unit fills with marked as Conflicted ones only when other Conflicted ones actually stopped (% > I really wonder if we can find a nicer way to solve this. I hope // Wbr, Alex _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel