On 02/01/13 14:25, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
On Wed, Jan 02, 2013 at 12:44:10PM +0000, John Lane wrote:
On 02/01/13 12:15, Andrey Borzenkov wrote:
В Wed, 02 Jan 2013 12:01:41 +0000
John Lane <syst...@jelmail.com> пишет:
Hello,
I have a configuration where a filesystem is mounted on /images.
Then a subdirectory of that filesystem, say /images/1, is bind mounted
on top as /images.
I think the problem is how systemd names the generated mount units.
If there is a clash, could it not
use a modified name for the unit (e.g if
/run/systemd/generator/images.mount exists it would create
/run/systemd/generator/images-1.mount or something like that) ?
Hi,
it's on the TODO list ("* properly handle .mount unit state tracking
when two mount points are stacked one on top of another on the exact
same mount point.") Patches welcome :)
Zbyszek
Good to know, thanks. I'll take a look and see if I'll provide a patch
if I can.
But I have never looked inside systemd so I may need some pointers to
find my way around it.
@tom: good point about not including a "-" in any variant filename.
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
