On Fri, 18.01.13 18:22, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote: > > Am 18.01.2013 18:14, schrieb Colin Walters: > >On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 16:14 +0100, Stephan Raue wrote: > > > >>src/core/manager.c: In function 'manager_setup_time_change': > >>src/core/manager.c:160:14: error: static assertion failed: > >>"sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)" > >> assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); > >> ^ > >You'll have to dive in here and adjust the code - this assumption is not > >true on x32. > > > > > this was clear to me, can i get any help with adjusting the code? :-)
Not sure what the best way is to detect an architecture where time_t is "long long" rather than "long". I figure there must be some macro we could check for. If we have that, the code can be changed to: #ifdef MACRO_TO_CHECK assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long long)); its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_LONG_MAX; #else assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_MAX; #endif i.e. the goal here is to initialize the time_t value that is tv_sec to the maximum possible value. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel