On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 11:11 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 07:34:29PM +0100, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> On Fri, 18.01.13 18:22, Stephan Raue (mailingli...@openelec.tv) wrote: >> >> > >> > Am 18.01.2013 18:14, schrieb Colin Walters: >> > >On Fri, 2013-01-18 at 16:14 +0100, Stephan Raue wrote: >> > > >> > >>src/core/manager.c: In function 'manager_setup_time_change': >> > >>src/core/manager.c:160:14: error: static assertion failed: >> > >>"sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)" >> > >> assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); >> > >> ^ >> > >You'll have to dive in here and adjust the code - this assumption is not >> > >true on x32. >> > > >> > > >> > this was clear to me, can i get any help with adjusting the code? :-) >> >> Not sure what the best way is to detect an architecture where time_t is >> "long long" rather than "long". I figure there must be some macro we >> could check for. If we have that, the code can be changed to: >> >> #ifdef MACRO_TO_CHECK >> assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long long)); >> its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_LONG_MAX; >> #else >> assert_cc(sizeof(time_t) == sizeof(long)); >> its.it_value.tv_sec = LONG_MAX; >> #endif >> >> i.e. the goal here is to initialize the time_t value that is tv_sec to >> the maximum possible value. > Fixed that.
Hmm, wouldn't: #define TIME_T_MAX (time_t)((1UL << ((sizeof(time_t) << 3) - 1)) - 1) just do the same without all the configure magic? Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
