St 27. březen 2013, 13:21:28 CET, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal:
On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 08:22:14AM +0100, Tollef Fog Heen wrote:
]] Cristian Rodríguez
El 26/03/13 15:17, Bill Nottingham escribió:
Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) said:
---
TODO | 2 --
man/systemd.unit.xml.in | 8 ++++++++
src/core/condition.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
src/core/condition.h | 1 +
src/core/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 | 1 +
5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
Not that this seems wrong, but what is the usage case for this that
can't be solved via package (de)installation?
The patch looks fine to me, what it solves ? well.. there may be
generic image deployments , who contain the same packages but one of
them is only really useful in arch s390 or ppc.. etc..
I think it should be kernel architecture if so, since you might very
well have multiple userland architectures enabled and working at the
same time. (So it should be ConditionKernelArchitecture to make it
clear.)
Shouldn't this be a glob, like ConditionHost=?
Zbyszek
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
I don't think that is necessary, the set of all architectures is quite
small. But it would just mean to replace
_______________________________________________
systemd-devel mailing list
systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
