On Wed, Mar 27, 2013 at 12:22 AM, Tollef Fog Heen <tfh...@err.no> wrote: > ]] Cristian Rodríguez > >> El 26/03/13 15:17, Bill Nottingham escribió: >> > Lukas Nykryn (lnyk...@redhat.com) said: >> >> --- >> >> TODO | 2 -- >> >> man/systemd.unit.xml.in | 8 ++++++++ >> >> src/core/condition.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++ >> >> src/core/condition.h | 1 + >> >> src/core/load-fragment-gperf.gperf.m4 | 1 + >> >> 5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) >> > >> > Not that this seems wrong, but what is the usage case for this that >> > can't be solved via package (de)installation? >> >> The patch looks fine to me, what it solves ? well.. there may be >> generic image deployments , who contain the same packages but one of >> them is only really useful in arch s390 or ppc.. etc.. > > I think it should be kernel architecture if so, since you might very > well have multiple userland architectures enabled and working at the > same time. (So it should be ConditionKernelArchitecture to make it > clear.)
or should it? on x86_64 one could have a kernel architecture supporting both x86_64 and i586, and running `setarch i586` does not change the kernel... Auke _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
