On Mon, Dec 30, 2013 at 03:00:06AM -0600, David Timothy Strauss wrote: > On Sun, Dec 29, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek > <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > > I have been looking at our bugs [1-10, there are others too] related to > > enabling/disabling of units and following of symlinks. Currently this > > is an unintuitive mess and some changes will have to be made. > > Another goal I have for any refinement in "enable" behavior is > defining how instances should work with commands. For example, because > we check "is-enabled" against the target of the symlinks, "systemctl > is-enabled nginx@123.service" returns false unless there's a specific > "nginx@123.service" unit (IIRC). So, "status" functions differently > from "is-enabled" in terms of how it matches up data. This gets really > weird when it comes to displaying the "enabled" state in the "status" > output. Yep, this should be fixed too.
I found another one: - https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66912 Autocompletion does not propose template units which have some instances enabled Zbyszek _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel