2014/1/16 Kay Sievers <k...@vrfy.org>: > On Thu, Jan 16, 2014 at 7:00 PM, Michael Biebl <mbi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> 2014/1/16 Lennart Poettering <lenn...@poettering.net>: > >>> Well, it can certainly continue to use and build against the old version >>> for a while, no? >> >> We'd have to make pre-systemd-209 and systemd-209 packages >> co-installable (different source package names etc.) to be able to >> continue to provide the old version. That is not really fun. > > Why? The lib is packaged separately, isn't it? What does it have to do > with the systemd package?
Packaged separately in the sense that the systemd source package builds a libsystemd-daemon0 binary package (among others). In systemd v209 we could no longer build such a libsystemd-daemon0 binary package from the systemd source package. We'd have to introduce a separate source package (based on systemd pre 209) named differently then systemd if we want to be able to continue to build libsystemd-daemon0. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
