On Wed, 19.02.14 21:54, Colin Guthrie (gm...@colin.guthr.ie) wrote: > >> Thanks for that. I did remember reading some posts about compilers so > >> figured they were all down to that but nice that an actual bug was found > >> too. > >> > >> Here's the results with 8f61afd. > > > > Are you sure you updated this properly? The warnings include lines of > > codes that don't even look like that anymore... > > > Hmm, fairly sure... although I do have some downsteam patches of course > as this is just from our RPM which will be clouding some things. > > I'll attach a build log without patches as off dd8875f93 (the final RPM > creation fails without the patches but the actual code compiles fine and > should be purely upstream)
YUpp, this one looks much more like it. All the warnings are gone now except the ppoll and static assert things. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering, Red Hat _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel