On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 9:26 PM, David Timothy Strauss <da...@davidstrauss.net> wrote: > On Sat, Apr 5, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Jason St. John <jstj...@purdue.edu> wrote: >> "init.debug" would be better than "systemd.debug", in my opinion. It >> is shorter (less typing and no possible end-user confusion over >> "systemd.debug" vs. "system.debug"), and it is init-agnostic. Other >> init systems (OpenRC, Upstart, etc.) would be able to add their own >> support for this, if they want, without requiring an init-specific >> kernel parameter. >> >> It just seems a lot simpler this way. > > It would be a little odd given how "systemd.<name>" is how other > probably portable options get namespaced. Arguably, systemd.log_level > would become init.log_level. I'm not against it, but it couldn't be > just init.debug.
That's a good point. Would patches be accepted that allowed both "systemd.log_level" and "init.log_level", etc.? Jason _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
